Entirely fine to you. To me the criticism made sense given the instructions it was given. To make a minor error just makes it no better than a human.
It did not hallucinate words that weren't in the text - there was a "this", just in the following sentence -, and when you make an error like that, it's quite ironic in this context that you're demanding better precision from a model you have such low opinion of than what you've demonstrated yourself.
Entirely fine to you. To me the criticism made sense given the instructions it was given. To make a minor error just makes it no better than a human.
It did not hallucinate words that weren't in the text - there was a "this", just in the following sentence -, and when you make an error like that, it's quite ironic in this context that you're demanding better precision from a model you have such low opinion of than what you've demonstrated yourself.