Comment by tonnydourado
5 days ago
Gotta say, 100/200 bucks monthly feels prohibitively expensive for even trying out something, particularly something as unproven as code-writing AI, even more particularly when other personal experiences with AI have been at the very least underwhelming, and extra particularly when the whole endeavor is so wrapped up in ethical concerns.
You can use Claude Code either pay-as-you-go with an API key, or subscribe to the $20 Pro subscription.
One month at 20 USD seems like it should be plenty to try it out on a small project or two to decide wether it is worth trying 100 bucks/month? Or one can just wait a couple of months as people report their learnings.
Try Aider with API usage. Learn how to control context size (/clear, /add, /drop). Limit context to 25K. Use whatever model you want (Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Pro).
For simple scripts, it often costs me under $1 to build. I'm working on a bigger tool these days, and I've done lots of prompts, a decent amount of code, over 100 tests, and my running total is right now under $6.
I'd suggest learn the basics of using AI to code using Aider, and then consider whether you want to try Claude Code (which is likely more powerful, but also more expensive unless you use it all the time).
Yeah I've been using Aider mostly and just started using Codex, very similar to Claude Code, yesterday. Aider is more manual and requires more guiding but it's also an order of magnitude cheaper.
The monkey brain part of me that really doesn't trust an LLM and trusts my decades of hard-won programming experience also prefers using Aider because the usage flow generally goes:
1. Iterate with Aider on a plan
2. Tell Aider to write code
3. Review the code
4. Continue hacking myself until I want to delegate something to an LLM again.
5. Head back to Step 1.
Codex automates this flow significantly but it's also a lot more expensive. Just the little bits of guiding I offer an LLM through Aider can make the whole process a lot cheaper.
It's unclear to me whether the full agentic Claude Code/Codex style approach will win or whether Aider's more carefully guided approach will win in the marketplace of ideas, but as a pretty experienced engineer Aider seems to be the sweet spot between cost, impact, and authorial input.
Yes, my concerns as well about the more powerful tools (which I admit I haven't tried).
Even with Aider, I feel it goes too fast and I sometimes actively slow it down (by giving it only very incremental changes rather than get it to do a larger chunk). I think I'd be totally lost with a more powerful agentic tool.
If you want it really cheap use Deepseek. Its off-peak rate is during the US workday and is like 50 cents per million tokens.
I’ve been using it with Aider and am struggling to even spend my first $5.