← Back to context

Comment by mulmen

2 days ago

I really don’t think training an agent on “your style” is the future. We’re more adaptable than the agents.

I think programming is a job people don’t need to do anymore and anyone who called themselves a software engineer is now a manager of agents. Jira is the interface. Define the requirements.

Writing your own code will still be a thing. We’ll even call those people hackers. But it will be a hobby.

> I think programming is a job people don’t need to do anymore and anyone who called themselves a software engineer is now a manager of agents. Jira is the interface. Define the requirements.

That Grand Canyon sized logical leap quoted ignores a vital concept: understanding.

To "define the requirements" sufficient enough for any given feature/defect/etc. requires a degree of formality not present in prose. This already exists and is in use presently:

  Programming languages.  See 4GL's[0] and 5GL's[1].

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth-generation_programming_...

1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth-generation_programming_l...

Unfortunately, management seems to be agreeing with you

I hope engineers have the sense to really set high prices when we're asked to fix the broken code that your "managers of agents" don't know how to fix

  • The open question is who is better at defining requirements for AI agents. Managers or engineers?