← Back to context Comment by tptacek 6 months ago No good reason! I'm genuinely curious. 2 comments tptacek Reply goldfeld 6 months ago I think maybe the reason is more arbitrary, as here look at this 90s author's symbolism, it's not just the old classics that are readable in-depth; contemporary style etc js2 6 months ago I thought it was answered by the article and the line I quoted. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
goldfeld 6 months ago I think maybe the reason is more arbitrary, as here look at this 90s author's symbolism, it's not just the old classics that are readable in-depth; contemporary style etc
I think maybe the reason is more arbitrary, as here look at this 90s author's symbolism, it's not just the old classics that are readable in-depth; contemporary style etc
I thought it was answered by the article and the line I quoted. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯