The maintainers are probably all making personally reasonable choices that we should support.
But it’s still sad that there’s probably no world where someone will still focus on jemalloc with professional support from their employer. It means that an important piece of technology will not continue improving.
Forking is possible, but it doesn’t look like the kind of project that many people could fork and improve, it requires a lot of focus by people with specific domain knowledge.
I don't understand why you don't understand that you can be sad about this.
Parent stated that he's sad the project is no longer maintained. That's a perfectly reasonable and human response. Parent does not have to defend having an emotion, even less provide objective truth for why he feels sad.
If you don't agree, fine. But I don't see why one would write a paragraph long statement, I validating someone's emotional response.
> That's a perfectly reasonable and human response.
It's hardly a reasonable response. By casually saying that it's "sad" when a maintainer gives up on a project, GP is also including a very real and heavy implication that this is somehow wrong on their part and that they should continue to shoulder that burden, as a demand from the community. This is a really unhealthy attitude and we should all do away with it. Instead, just acknowledge that the project is now there for the taking by anyone who may be interested. There's nothing "sad!" about this whatsoever, and we should not pretend that there is.
If my kid is sad that she cannot have an extra granola bar, that does not imply that I am wrong to deny her, or even that she thinks I am wrong, it just means she wishes she could have one.
You don't really get to decide whether someone's entirely in-passing mention of an emotional response to developments in something they worked on is 'reasonable' or not, and more importantly, it's not at all a topic of interesting conversation, just pedantic nitpicking.
The maintainers are probably all making personally reasonable choices that we should support.
But it’s still sad that there’s probably no world where someone will still focus on jemalloc with professional support from their employer. It means that an important piece of technology will not continue improving.
Forking is possible, but it doesn’t look like the kind of project that many people could fork and improve, it requires a lot of focus by people with specific domain knowledge.
I don't understand why you don't understand that you can be sad about this.
Parent stated that he's sad the project is no longer maintained. That's a perfectly reasonable and human response. Parent does not have to defend having an emotion, even less provide objective truth for why he feels sad.
If you don't agree, fine. But I don't see why one would write a paragraph long statement, I validating someone's emotional response.
> That's a perfectly reasonable and human response.
It's hardly a reasonable response. By casually saying that it's "sad" when a maintainer gives up on a project, GP is also including a very real and heavy implication that this is somehow wrong on their part and that they should continue to shoulder that burden, as a demand from the community. This is a really unhealthy attitude and we should all do away with it. Instead, just acknowledge that the project is now there for the taking by anyone who may be interested. There's nothing "sad!" about this whatsoever, and we should not pretend that there is.
If my kid is sad that she cannot have an extra granola bar, that does not imply that I am wrong to deny her, or even that she thinks I am wrong, it just means she wishes she could have one.
2 replies →
You don't really get to decide whether someone's entirely in-passing mention of an emotional response to developments in something they worked on is 'reasonable' or not, and more importantly, it's not at all a topic of interesting conversation, just pedantic nitpicking.
3 replies →