← Back to context

Comment by Centigonal

2 days ago

This argument gets invoked a lot when it comes to medical dishonesty, but I really don't think it applies in the case of ME/CFS. If we could find the pathology behind the condition, there is huge money to be made in pharmaceutical treatments. Just look at the enormous amount of money being made treating auto-immune illnesses with Humira/Skyrizi/Xeljanz/etc, treating diabetes with GLP-1 agonists and CGMs, and treating obesity with GLP-1 agonists (and depression before all that!). Sometimes treating the chronically ill is the most profitable option.

ME/CFS shows up as immune system dysfunction and for most people is likely downstream from dysautonomia. Given the huge overlap of people with long covid and hEDS, and that long covid presents as dysautonomia, the math likely works out that most people with ME/CFS actually have hEDS. It’s massively underdiagnosed. It’s likely one of many TNXB SNPs, these are overlooked for a few main reasons - it’s considered too common for a rare condition and it’s hard to sequence and only detectable with modern high quality deep WGS.

The other thing is that GLP-1As actually do appear to help with autoimmune conditions and has been, in my case and in the case of many others, one of the most effective medications for treating ME/CFS.

I wish it was a lack of a profit motive that caused medical researchers to be so off base but it appears what is more likely that they’re not very good with stats, as being good at stats would get in the way of all the ‘accidental’ p-hacking they’re so addicted to.

Edit: Added an email to my hacker news user details

  • Most of us (myself included) are not medical doctors specialized in this field. Could you please expand your acronyms? I only know of CFS (if it's the same one) because a cousin has it.

  • Could you drop a form of contact? I have some questions about your knowledge of MECFS (especially regarding your comment about test cyp. & hgh for CCI)

I agree, but will the money be made by the same people? Like, if a psychologists group stands to benefit from treating it they wouldn't reap the benefit of the pharma research. Kind of like how the alcohol industry lobbies against weed or other possible substitutes. Or the car companies buying out the rail roads and then shutting them down to prevent competition. There is just so much inefficiency from competing industries sabotaging each other. You are also making a leap that understanding the cause is physiological means that there is a drug you could sell and not cost billions of dollars to get to market without risk. I always wonder about the PReP drugs for treating AIDS was really the best outcome instead of aiming for the cure. Definitely tradeoffs with a lot of money one way or another.

  • The psychologist lobby is not as powerful as you seem to think. Pharmaceutical companies have brought numerous drugs to market that have proven to be more effective than talk therapy for certain serious chronic mental health conditions.

  • I think that's reasonable. I think there's definitely an economy-wide bias by vested interests against disruption, which gets us stuck in local maxima, sometimes for centuries.