Comment by sorcerer-mar
1 day ago
Do you think journalists don't have sides and don't have effects on politics?
Riddle me this: why do you think journalism is protected in this country if it is definitionally politically inert?
1 day ago
Do you think journalists don't have sides and don't have effects on politics?
Riddle me this: why do you think journalism is protected in this country if it is definitionally politically inert?
This person is from another country and is rather an activist than a journalist, and he also can continue to express his views to this day.
Does it not make sense to you that a country (i.e, its citizens) don't actually want foreign activists to come and steer its politics? Sounds like a recipe for country take-over if done at scale.
My recommendation is that when you're inquiring about another country's laws or norms, you actually open your ears to what they're telling you instead of just repeatedly asserting your own (as you admit) completely ignorant perspective.
Anyone foreigner around the world has the right to assemble in the US? I don't think these are the laws that the US has.
2 replies →
The founders were proto-shitposters who ran a psyop on the public with the same technology used to print the daily paper. They knew what they were doing.
I agree with you, by the way. To a certain reading, this guy is creating a valuable resource in the attention economy: controversy. Give them a medal and a journalism grant.