← Back to context Comment by kreetx 2 days ago So you are saying that anyone in the world has the rights listed in the US constitution? 14 comments kreetx Reply jakelazaroff 2 days ago When they are under the jurisdiction of US law enforcement? Yes, they do. kreetx 2 days ago So I guess the neat way for US to deny entry to people is somehow have the denying done by non-law-enforcement and also perhaps somehow outside of its soil (if that matters)? 1718627440 2 days ago Or they could change the constitution if they don't want to abide to it? 11 replies →
jakelazaroff 2 days ago When they are under the jurisdiction of US law enforcement? Yes, they do. kreetx 2 days ago So I guess the neat way for US to deny entry to people is somehow have the denying done by non-law-enforcement and also perhaps somehow outside of its soil (if that matters)? 1718627440 2 days ago Or they could change the constitution if they don't want to abide to it? 11 replies →
kreetx 2 days ago So I guess the neat way for US to deny entry to people is somehow have the denying done by non-law-enforcement and also perhaps somehow outside of its soil (if that matters)? 1718627440 2 days ago Or they could change the constitution if they don't want to abide to it? 11 replies →
1718627440 2 days ago Or they could change the constitution if they don't want to abide to it? 11 replies →
When they are under the jurisdiction of US law enforcement? Yes, they do.
So I guess the neat way for US to deny entry to people is somehow have the denying done by non-law-enforcement and also perhaps somehow outside of its soil (if that matters)?
Or they could change the constitution if they don't want to abide to it?
11 replies →