Comment by gosub100
7 hours ago
It shows how quickly the far left abandons its charity cases once it finds greener pastures. Remember all the "end ___ hate" campaigns? Not when there's a new group to manipulate for votes.
7 hours ago
It shows how quickly the far left abandons its charity cases once it finds greener pastures. Remember all the "end ___ hate" campaigns? Not when there's a new group to manipulate for votes.
I've responded now to several of your comments, but this is a common enough sign of miseducation among the terminally online that I'll respond again here:
The far left is within their First Amendment rights to create "all the 'end ___ hate' campaigns" they want. The far right is within their First Amendment rights to create all the "hate _____" campaigns they want.
Bystanders, commercial entities, private schools, your friends and family are allowed to be friendly with you or disown you per their own preference for which side you take. They're even allowed to call you mean names like "ignorant fascist incel" if they want. And you're allowed to call them mean names too!
The government is not allowed to utilize state power to suppress either side of the hate or not-hate debate. It is not allowed to utilize state power to compel the "end hate" crowd to be nice to, give jobs to, maintain platforms for, or educate the "hate" crowd, nor vice versa.
> this is a common enough sign of miseducation among the terminally online
"anyone who disagrees with you is obviously ill"
No, I said that you have a very elementary misunderstanding that's common among a specific group of people.
It's like saying, "the inability to add 1 + 1 is common among people who never attended an arithmetic class."