Comment by kreetx
1 day ago
The people who we are debating with seem to have the opinion that people from around the world have the right to assemble in the United States. That indeed is an interesting take.
1 day ago
The people who we are debating with seem to have the opinion that people from around the world have the right to assemble in the United States. That indeed is an interesting take.
> The people who we are debating with seem to have the opinion that people from around the world have the right to assemble in the United States. That indeed is an interesting take.
Our opinion is that the US Constitution applies to the people within a US jurisdiction. In this, our opinion is correct.
As far as you disagree with that, your disagreement will be with the Constitution - which is your inalienable right.
Had he been denied entry at point of departure, would that have been ok?
> Had he been denied entry at point of departure, would that have been ok?
You are asking how I'd feel if a foreign government took some action against him at their border?
This question is fairly far afield; it would be a wholly different discussion.
3 replies →
It's ideological libertarinism taken to the absurd point of essentially anarchy.
> It's ideological libertarinism taken to the absurd point of essentially anarchy.
Constitutionalism is about the core restraints placed on Gov. Not violating the constitution is it's own thing. Because it defines order, it is the opposite of anarchy.
Does some ideology or some facet of libertarian overlap here? I have no idea. It isn't relevant tho.
No visa is required when you want to assemble in the United States?