← Back to context

Comment by Nursie

8 months ago

Offensive to good sense, not aggressive.

Mysticism usually seems to me to imply a poor grasp on reality and can be accompanied by all sorts of baseless claims to knowledge and (often naturalistic) fallacies. It often goes hand in hand with silly beliefs about crystals, alt-med and all sorts of other crap.

"We don't know" is fine. "We don't know, therefore these specific lines of bullshit" less so.

But I didn't post the above to say that my views on mysticism are correct or even to provoke a discussion about it. I posted it to provide a counterpoint to the bizarre notion that one must be into mysticism to experience aspects of the psychedelic experience.

We may interpret the experiences very differently, of course, but the claim that part of it is closed to those who don't subscribe to witter about "the goddess" is ironically very egotistic.

No need to debate about. It was just for my curiosity what triggered you and indeed what you describe I rather label esoteric new age stuff and that mostly puts me off as well.

  • Fair enough, I'm not especially familiar with mystic traditions in major religions, or eastern flavours of mysticism. But I have spent a reasonable amount of time around Wiccans, neo-pagans etc and various crunchy 'spiritual' types and my opinions are not very flattering...