← Back to context Comment by wodenokoto 8 months ago That’s the whole point of zoning 5 comments wodenokoto Reply pjc50 8 months ago But why?(semi-rhetorical, but that's exactly the discussion we're having here, whether people should be allowed a backyard coffee shop) frollogaston 8 months ago Externalities. But I'm not a fan of the neighborhoods that have nothing but houses for miles. Gotta balance it a little more. zbrozek 7 months ago Just directly regulate the externalities with measurable objective limits rather than ban all land uses but one. 1 reply →
pjc50 8 months ago But why?(semi-rhetorical, but that's exactly the discussion we're having here, whether people should be allowed a backyard coffee shop) frollogaston 8 months ago Externalities. But I'm not a fan of the neighborhoods that have nothing but houses for miles. Gotta balance it a little more. zbrozek 7 months ago Just directly regulate the externalities with measurable objective limits rather than ban all land uses but one. 1 reply →
frollogaston 8 months ago Externalities. But I'm not a fan of the neighborhoods that have nothing but houses for miles. Gotta balance it a little more. zbrozek 7 months ago Just directly regulate the externalities with measurable objective limits rather than ban all land uses but one. 1 reply →
zbrozek 7 months ago Just directly regulate the externalities with measurable objective limits rather than ban all land uses but one. 1 reply →
But why?
(semi-rhetorical, but that's exactly the discussion we're having here, whether people should be allowed a backyard coffee shop)
Externalities. But I'm not a fan of the neighborhoods that have nothing but houses for miles. Gotta balance it a little more.
Just directly regulate the externalities with measurable objective limits rather than ban all land uses but one.
1 reply →