Comment by pfortuny
6 months ago
Just trying to help: "i.e." stands for "id est", which means "that is".
In your text, you should rather say "e.g." (exempli gratia), which means "for instance", "for example".
6 months ago
Just trying to help: "i.e." stands for "id est", which means "that is".
In your text, you should rather say "e.g." (exempli gratia), which means "for instance", "for example".
I think in casual speech at this point (at least in my experience) the two are used interchangeably. In professional or legal settings I'm sure the distinction matters more, but I feel like OP's usage here felt pretty natural to me even though it's not technically correct.
They aren't interchangeable. "i.e." is equivalent to "in other words". "e.g." is "for example".
The distinction matters because i.e. implies English is the only non-phonetic language in existence.
> I think in casual speech at this point (at least in my experience) the two are used interchangeably.
How?
They don't mean the same thing.
Better to get corrected in an informal setting, than to use it wrong on a formal one.
Well, the thing is… when you use a borrowed term from a dead language, in writing, it really sounds wrong to cultivated ears. I really had to double-check that sentence to see if I had parsed it wrongly. Not bragging, just saying.
They cannot be completely interchangeable:
“There are white people among us: i.e. me and my father” is totally different from “…: e.g. me and my father”.
it's "my father and I"