← Back to context Comment by rafael09ed 6 months ago [flagged] 2 comments rafael09ed Reply geoffpado 6 months ago But… he didn’t? He used the GPLv3 license, which has other requirements. Requirements that aren’t being met by the people who forked the codebase. Semaphor 6 months ago But they didn’t. The company violated the GPL by re-publishing it illegally as Apache.
geoffpado 6 months ago But… he didn’t? He used the GPLv3 license, which has other requirements. Requirements that aren’t being met by the people who forked the codebase.
Semaphor 6 months ago But they didn’t. The company violated the GPL by re-publishing it illegally as Apache.
But… he didn’t? He used the GPLv3 license, which has other requirements. Requirements that aren’t being met by the people who forked the codebase.
But they didn’t. The company violated the GPL by re-publishing it illegally as Apache.