Comment by Ukv

> The big difference here is that you’re applying B2C terms on B2B licenses.

Both are cases of B2B licensing with the latter business then selling a product on to consumers.

> This would essentially ban enterprise B2B licenses for video game software which is insanity

I don't see how. If for instance some company develops an audio processing library, they can still license it out to a game development company for a limited time - just that the license would be "the company can no longer sell games with this technology after the license expires", opposed to anything that would prevent functioning of the already-sold games. Or rather, they could stipulate the latter in their license, but then their market would be limited to game development companies willing to patch it out after the license expires.