Comment by defrost

> It's framed around a new update to Grok but then references old tweets of peoples interactions a while back.

The first half of the article is all about 'new' Grok responses made in the past day or so, with the implication these all follow on from the new Grok announcement.

The old tweets are in the last half and specifically refer to Grok responses to similar topics in the past for comparison.

Regardless of the article quality or bias the format (new responses versus old) is pretty typical and as expected .. how else does one write about a comparison of old V. new without reference to old?