Comment by frozenseven
6 months ago
(1) Did you really? You pivoted to a version of the argument where "scale matters". That's also not a thing. If scale matters, it doesn't in terms of style. You could conceivably make an argument based on competition, but even that is very hard to prove in court.
(2) "Copying", as in verbatim using/memorizing sizeable chunks of content and suchlike? No, the goal of ML training is to generalize across concepts. I didn't make an argument based on some direct connection to neuroscience, but I also reject the idea that there isn't one.
(3) So it's an irrelevant point. Some people are upset about technology? I honestly don't care.
(4) You said that the big bad corporations are making money. I'm saying that FOSS alternatives are all over the place.
(5) That so? My code of ethics says that Luddites getting steamrolled is an immense moral good.
(6) See (1).
> Some people are upset about technology? I honestly don't care.
> My code of ethics says that Luddites getting steamrolled is an immense moral good.
Looks like it's not possible for us to discuss this further. Not because of your views, but how rigid you are on your beliefs and perspective.
With no hard feelings, I wish that time shows that you're right, all the time.
Have a nice day. :)