← Back to context

Comment by pzo

2 days ago

good article I just don't know why author prefer to spell all numbers using words rather than digits. It's very mentally taxing for me to read, e.g:

>> of twenty-one thousand respondents in twenty-one countries, found that sixty-eight per cent favored solar energy, “five times more [...]

could be just:

>> of 21,000 responders in 21 countries, found that 68% favored solar energy, "5x more [...]

I believe this is a New Yorker magazine house style thing. I'd assume the author uses numerals in the book this article is based on.

  • If there are two options, you can trust they'll go for the more verbose one.

    • Autors are often paid by word count. Note that I'm not saying that's the reason here, but it could be.

That's simply good writing practice. I find it more taxing to read digits than prose.

  • Thank you. To me after reading the parent comment the numbers option was so evidently better that I didn't even consider that someone like you could exist. My conception of humanity has been slightly enlarged.

    If I may ask: Do you also find numbers more difficult to parse when doing math pure math operations? Is this:

    Two hundred thirty five plus one thousand eight hundred twenty two

    Also easier for you to parse than this?

    235 + 1822

    Or do you have two "parsing modes" ("text" and "math"), and going from one to the other is the difficult part?

  • I was taught numbers up to ten should be spelled, the rest use digits

    • Chicago Manual of Style (though it says 1 to 100, er, I mean one to one-hundred). I try to use a CMOS subset for my professional/technical writing, mostly for consistency, but, partly so that I don't need to argue with people with subjective opinions about how I'm writing it wrong.