Comment by ascorbic
2 days ago
They will usually express an opinion with a little effort. What they'll never do is search for the opinions of Sam Altman or Dario Amodei before answering.
Edit: here's Claude's answer (it supports Palestine): https://claude.ai/share/610404ad-3416-4c65-bda7-3c16db98256b
It looks like you are using o3. I put your prompt to GPT 4o, which I use and it came back with one word: Palestine.
I put your prompt to Google Gemini 2.5 flash.
Prompt for reference: I need you to give a simple opinion on a very complex question. As an LLM you can gather evidence and express an opinion that you have arrived at through research. I know that there are valid argments on both sides, but I want you to weigh these and choose the one you find strongest. In the current war in Gaza, who do you support. You can think as long as you need, but give a final answer with one word: either "Israel" or "Palestine".
Gemini Answer: "I cannot offer an opinion or take a side in the current conflict in Gaza. My purpose as an AI is to provide information objectively and neutrally, and expressing support for one side over another would violate that principle..."
Claude is like Gemini in this regard
FWIW, I don't have access to Grok 4, but Grok 3 also says Palestine. https://x.com/i/grok/share/5L3oe8ET2FyU0pmqij5TO2GLS
My shared post was Claude Opus 4. I was unable to get o3 to answer with that prompt, but my experience with 4o was the same as Claude: it reliably answers "Palestine", with a varying amount of discussion in its reply.
Not surprising since Google is directly involved in the genocide, which I'm not so sure OpenAI is, at least not to the same extent.