Comment by camgunz

I have two responses to the "code review fixes these problems" argument.

One: The work to get code to a reviewable point is significant. Skipping it, either with or without AI, is just going to elongate the review process.

Two: The whole point of using AI is to outsource the thought to a machine that can think much faster than you can in order to ship faster. If the normal dev process was 6 hours to write and 2 hours to review, and the AI dev process was 1 hour to write and 8 hours to review, the author will say "hey why is review taking so long; this defeats the purpose". You can't say "code review fixes these problems" and then bristle at the necessary extra review.