Comment by mrkramer
6 days ago
Yea management failed but wouldn't the most logical thing be to call in computer forensics experts and quality test the software, reverse engineering it and try to catch the bugs. This wasn't the classic case of financial fraud, this was all about faulty software.
The Post Office management knew about the bugs but didn't want to take the blame for the accounting issues they caused (since it was management that purchased and approved the software some blame would have fallen on them).
Fujitsu was all to blame, after all they created and maintained the software. It just blows my mind why would courts pursue the individuals and not the creator of the software, when they realized that this mess was widespread and not isolated.
because UK law says (said?) the computer can't be wrong
and the post office management had no interest in proving otherwise
they should be going after the management
5 replies →
> Yea management failed but wouldn't the most logical thing be to call in computer forensics experts
Yea and who is responsible for engaging them?
I meant courts should've called in multiple expert witnesses and even computer forensics companies. This case looks like government or in this case courts colluded with British Post Office.
> I meant courts should've called in multiple expert witnesses and even computer forensics companies.
UK courts don’t (can’t) do that, that’s up to the plaintiffs or defendants.