Comment by DiogenesKynikos
2 days ago
Contrary to what you're claiming, a major point of disagreement in all the peace negotiations has been that the Palestinians want the 1967 borders,[0] while the Israelis insist on taking considerable territory beyond those borders.
0. Which you referred to as the borders of 1948.
> Contrary to what you're claiming, a major point of disagreement in all the peace negotiations has been that the Palestinians want the 1967 borders
Nope. They refused any deal, including the ones with a land swaps and capital in East Jerusalem.
> while the Israelis insist on taking considerable territory beyond those borders.
Israelis offered land for peace multiple times. Moreover, Israelis signed deals that were based on land for peace, e.g., Egypt. Palestinians got autonomy only to establish a "pay for slay" government-funded fund to incentivize more Palestinians to commit terrorist attacks.
The Palestinians offered peace many times. The Israelis refused. It goes both ways.
One of the reasons why the Palestinians refused the Israeli offers was because the Israelis never offered the 1967 borders, which is what the Palestinians want. This is the exact opposite of what you're saying.
> Moreover, Israelis signed deals that were based on land for peace, e.g., Egypt.
The difference is that the Egyptians had a serious army that scared the bejeezus out of the Israelis is 1973. Israel only respects the language of force.
> Palestinians got autonomy only to establish a "pay for slay"
Israel has a massive "pay for slay" program. It's called the IDF.
> The Palestinians offered peace many times.
Can you list those "many times"?
> The difference is that the Egyptians had a serious army that scared the bejeezus out of the Israelis is 1973. Israel only respects the language of force.
You mean the one that Israel won? You do realize that your argument holds no water for the simple reason that there was like 5-6 years between the war of 1973 and siding of the peace deal? If Egyptian army was so strong, why did they left Sinai in Israeli hands after the war of 1973? If this army was so strong why did they need to sign a peace deal at all?
> Israel has a massive "pay for slay" program. It's called the IDF.
Can you point me to the part of this "program" that increases the pay to IDF soldiers with number of Palestinians they kill?
I think it will be hard for you to find this part for a simple reason -- it does not exist. Service in the IDF is not voluntary, and the salary for every soldier is the same.
Palestinian government-sponsored terrorism is completely different: first of all, you are not forced to participate, and second -- the more you kill, the more money you get.
So, you can continue with these false equivalences but they hold no water, and easy to dispute.
1 reply →