← Back to context Comment by saagarjha 2 days ago Not if your scheduler causes accumulation in a different order. 2 comments saagarjha Reply williamdclt 2 days ago Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible saagarjha 11 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
williamdclt 2 days ago Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible saagarjha 11 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
saagarjha 11 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible
Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.