← Back to context Comment by saagarjha 2 days ago Not if your scheduler causes accumulation in a different order. 2 comments saagarjha Reply williamdclt 2 days ago Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible saagarjha 6 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
williamdclt 2 days ago Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible saagarjha 6 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
saagarjha 6 hours ago Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.
Are you talking about a DAG of FP calculations, where parallel steps might finish in different order across different executions? That's getting out of my area of knowledge, but I'd believe it's possible
Well a very simple example would be if you run a parallel reduce using atomics the result will depend on which workers acquire the accumulator first.