Comment by BobaFloutist
6 days ago
The United States (famously) has stronger free speech protections and weaker libel/slander laws, yet seems to have less of an issue with tabloids. Is there maybe more of a divide between what's alloweable for "public figures" versus private citizens? Or maybe even our right-wing rags are more skeptical of the government? I don't know what the difference is, but you seem to see less of this sort of thing, gross as our tabloids still are. Maybe it really is just a cultural difference somehow.
The US equivalent of a tabloid would be Fox News, right? #1 most viewed media outlet, argued in court nobody would take them seriously yet they do, current self-destructive regime wouldn't be in power without them? They're much worse.
The US tabloids are awful. Any checkout isle at a Walmart, Dollar General, etc is just littered with them, right next to the disposable lighter packs and chewing gum.
But nobody reads them in the US[1], and many are about celebrities or cryptids or what-have-you rather than current events or private citizens. There's definitely a cultural difference here.
[1] UK has 1/4th of the population of the US but The Sun has 4x the circulation of The New York Post. The Daily Mirror every day puts out 4x the number of papers that The National Enquirer puts out in a week.
Sure, I did say they were gross, but they just seem to mostly cause less concrete damage. Not sure why.
they aren't nearly as toxic as the UK tabloids.
Also, I never hear anybody talk about what the tabloids are reporting. There's a lot of social stigma attached to them in the US.