Comment by olalonde
1 day ago
> though 20 blocks were rolled back on at least 2 occasions
Do you mean because of the bugs mentioned earlier or during the normal course of operations? Curious to read more about that.
> Regarding forks, there was BCH, BSV, etc. - those were not programming errors.
That's a different kind of "fork" though and those are arguably not Bitcoin. They're basically just competing cryptocurrencies that happened to use an existing blockchain to get started.
> those are arguably not Bitcoin
Q.E.D.
You proved it’s a social consensus
Naming things is, indeed. The protocol is not.
Incredibly pedantic, no less when this whole thing started with "seems like someone missed the boat"
1 reply →