I don’t review every single line that AI generates. I glance over the files to see if they meet my standards, prompt it to rewrite this or that portion, when necessary. Or change it myself.
Writing code is the most tedious part, not reviewing.
Personally I've had mixed experience when I let Sonnet 3.7 document my (and its) code and write commit messages, for some wip stuff it's alright but it soon gets out of hand and because it doesn't really have a direct view in my mind it ends up documenting what it sees instead of the intention behind it, which is totally fair but eh.
So yeah, mileage varies and agentic tools usually spit out more code and redundant comments than I'd like to review. I'm still waiting for a company to develop some sanity check for this somehow but snapshot testing and manual review aren't enough sadly.
I don’t review every single line that AI generates. I glance over the files to see if they meet my standards, prompt it to rewrite this or that portion, when necessary. Or change it myself.
Writing code is the most tedious part, not reviewing.
oh gotcha. you are a solo dev on the work you are doing. makes sense.
I am an IT project manager ;) But apparently you can solve lots of problems with code.
He didn’t answer because he didn’t even read your comment. Likely a bot
Yeah, I am a bot.
Gemini of course! /s
Personally I've had mixed experience when I let Sonnet 3.7 document my (and its) code and write commit messages, for some wip stuff it's alright but it soon gets out of hand and because it doesn't really have a direct view in my mind it ends up documenting what it sees instead of the intention behind it, which is totally fair but eh.
So yeah, mileage varies and agentic tools usually spit out more code and redundant comments than I'd like to review. I'm still waiting for a company to develop some sanity check for this somehow but snapshot testing and manual review aren't enough sadly.