← Back to context

Comment by almostgotcaught

1 day ago

lol i think you didn't read/understand this - the article is about **kwargs (which is sometimes sloppy) while the person you're responding to is talking about "exploding" a dict when calling a function (this does not require **kwargs at all).

So when they said "kwargs" they didn't actually mean **kwargs they meant something else which doesn't even require kwargs? How did you magically infer that?