← Back to context

Comment by delichon

2 days ago

I want a button on each user (that opts in) that allows me to see their feed just as they do. A read-only impersonation. When I see a take that I wildly disagree with I frequently wonder what set of views of the world they are operating from. This feature would help look at the world from behind the eyes of those I need to learn from the most: those that seem to live in a different one.

A starter pack in comparison is a one-click embubbler. We need better bubble explorers and comparers. Like "Grok, me and @joe disagree on <topic-x>. Compare the relevant items in each of our feeds and summarize the difference in values, facts and sources that we consume."

I (and I assume this is probably true for most people) don't want you to have access to this kind of information about me. It's as if you'd want to know every book on my bookshelf. I'm not letting strangers into my home to get that information.

  • Follows are already public information.

    • So is one's location while in public. It doesn't mean I want someone tracking my location every time I leave the house. The aggregation of public data can end up being an invasion of perceived privacy.

      1 reply →

    • A lot of what drives feed algorithms are interactions rather than just follows.

      I imagine it’s one reason why X/Twitter made likes private as they want people to like things for the algorithm but not be judged for their likes.

You want to judge someone based on some social network feed algorithm, sounds crazy and dystopian to me.

  • He doesn't want to judge people he wants to understand people. It is the opposite of a judgment. The idea is that you see someone on social media with ideas you disagree with, but instead of stopping there and dismissing that guy as an asshole, you try to see where these ideas come from and maybe realize that he has a point.

    Now this feature could be used to reinforce your bubble (the crazy and dystopian scenario you refer to) instead of bursting out of it. How you see such a feature may be more telling about your own personality than about the feature itself.

This is definitely doable and anyone can build such a feed using Bluesky's APIs.

As an example, I built a "For You" feed https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:3guzzweuqraryl3rdkimjamk/fe... that finds the posts you liked, finds other people who liked the same posts and shows you what else they liked.

To help me debug the algorithm I built a simple web UI that allows you to see the feed for any user by plugging their account id: https://linklonk.com/bluesky

You can switch perspective to other users and explore how the would experience the feed.

Funny. I want the opposite. I want people to stop posting their opinions on the Internet.

Every time I go to Youtube and I see "the X situation is insane!" I'm like "what is even X? Why are you showing me this?"

The whole social media landscape is engineered toward drama and people arguing over pointless things they have no control over, being controversial all for "engagement." It's pretty depressing.

Personal tracking? What is stopping you from building a bot that uses this feature to view other peoples personal taste and building a shadow profile that then is used to manipulate them?

You can already do this by scraping their follows list and building a pseudo display of what a person looked at.

  • You are just describing what advertisers actually do in practice. Maybe if everyone had the same access people would realize how invasive it is.

    • Advertisers less track you and more decide what demographic bucket to stick you in.

      It’s a subtle but important (and hard to admit) difference; because it relies on realizing that we’re not special snowflakes, but we have a whole group of people we’re like.

      5 replies →

    • So we give everyone single click access and people become bigger monsters or people wake up finally? Make it a separate tool.

> Compare the relevant items in each of our feeds and summarize the difference in values, facts and sources that we consume."

Surely it'd be easier to just view the delta? Once you have an algorithm in there summarizing things that value is lost.