If you're interested, the Austral language (not my creation, but I'm a fan of the author's work) has ownership semantics where freeing is always explicit and in the hands of the programmer, but it's still safe like Rust.
Because both the destructor calls and the "borrowing" scopes have to be written explicitly in the language, it really helps in understanding how it all fits together.
If you're interested, the Austral language (not my creation, but I'm a fan of the author's work) has ownership semantics where freeing is always explicit and in the hands of the programmer, but it's still safe like Rust.
Because both the destructor calls and the "borrowing" scopes have to be written explicitly in the language, it really helps in understanding how it all fits together.
Thanks for the pointer.