← Back to context

Comment by cosmojg

7 months ago

For what it's worth, I think Kimi's modified MIT license still meets the OSI definition of "open source." For example, the explicitly OSI-approved "Attribute Assurance License"[1] contains similar wording:

> each time the resulting executable program or a program dependent thereon is launched, a prominent display (e.g., splash screen or banner text) of the Author’s attribution information

[1] https://opensource.org/license/attribution-php

2 comments

cosmojg

Reply
pabs3  6 months ago

It probably doesn't because the attribution requirement discriminates against certain groups (large commercial organisations).