Not at all. I think you misunderstood the point I was making here.
I think the idea of splitting Hacker News into AI and not AI is honestly a little absurd.
If you don't want to engage with LLM and AI content on Hacker News, don't engage with it! Scroll right on past. Don't click it.
If you're not going to do that, then since we are hackers here and we solve things by building tools, building a tool that filters out the stuff you don't want to see is trivial. So trivial I could get o3 to solve it for me in literally minutes.
(This is a pointed knock at the "AI isn't even useful crowd", just in case any of them are still holding out.)
There's a solid meta-joke here too, which is that filtering on keywords is a bad way to solve this problem. The better way to solve this profile... is to use AI!
So yeah, I'm not embarrassed at all. I think my joke and meta joke were pretty great.
Not at all. I think you misunderstood the point I was making here.
I think the idea of splitting Hacker News into AI and not AI is honestly a little absurd.
If you don't want to engage with LLM and AI content on Hacker News, don't engage with it! Scroll right on past. Don't click it.
If you're not going to do that, then since we are hackers here and we solve things by building tools, building a tool that filters out the stuff you don't want to see is trivial. So trivial I could get o3 to solve it for me in literally minutes.
(This is a pointed knock at the "AI isn't even useful crowd", just in case any of them are still holding out.)
There's a solid meta-joke here too, which is that filtering on keywords is a bad way to solve this problem. The better way to solve this profile... is to use AI!
So yeah, I'm not embarrassed at all. I think my joke and meta joke were pretty great.
It solves the problem in a simpler and faster way than OP requested. OP does not wish to see AI content, this tool solves it. Simple.
Your statement is factually incorrect. Have you no embarrassment?