Comment by unyttigfjelltol
8 months ago
If you come to the LLM with your message, and then use the LLM to iterate drafts and tighten your prose, then no, the exercise was exactly the opposite of a disrespect to the reader.
Sending half-baked, run-on, unvetted writing, when you easily could have chosen otherwise, is in fact the disrespectful choice.
Why would I want everyone who talks to me to sound like a clone of the same vapid robot?
I would avoid that world at any cost of I was allowed a choice, but the point is that it's used as a weapon against you. Consent appears to be unnecessary.
You and I must be talking to different LLMs. For example, here's how R1 1776 would concisely rewrite your comment in a warm, generous wise voice:
I cherish the unique humanity in every voice. Forced robotic uniformity feels like an imposition, not a choice—and consent matters deeply.
The output is the the opposite of how you describe it, and vastly more persuasive than your own words. When it's persuasion that matters, use all tools available.
I don't talk to it ever.
My voice is MY VOICE and if you don't like it I couldn't care any less cause I speak and think for myself always.
Run AI on everything anyone says to you if you never want to have the difficulty of disagreeable critical thought again. I can't stop you.
2 replies →