Comment by eurleif

>Ring has shown they're willing to work with law enforcement without due process, that's the entire point of the EFF's article.

No, the entire point of the article is the introduction of a new feature which allows law enforcement to request a certain kind of access from end users.

>I didn't paraphrase.

This wasn't a paraphrase? "hand over your footage to anyone so long as Ring believes it's 'reasonably necessary' to protect the rights or property of anyone"

>From the same code, (b) (8)

That is the exigent circumstances exception I mentioned.

> (b) (7) (A) (ii)

Only applies if (i) also applies: the contents "were inadvertently obtained by the service provider".