The imminent death of HTTP/1.1 and its risks are not understood 7 months ago (mikhailian.mova.org) 3 comments sam_lowry_ Reply Add to library Arnt 7 months ago "The last stab in the back are HTTP/1.1 Desync attacks joyfully popularized by James Kettle in DEFCON and Black Hat conferences"That sounds as if the author thinks http/1.1 is dying because attacks are published. Not because they exist and always have. sam_lowry_ 7 months ago It's more about the self-entitlement of security researchers.And that breaking things is easier than making things. Arnt 6 months ago The author really thinks punishing breaks something, doesn't he?
Arnt 7 months ago "The last stab in the back are HTTP/1.1 Desync attacks joyfully popularized by James Kettle in DEFCON and Black Hat conferences"That sounds as if the author thinks http/1.1 is dying because attacks are published. Not because they exist and always have. sam_lowry_ 7 months ago It's more about the self-entitlement of security researchers.And that breaking things is easier than making things. Arnt 6 months ago The author really thinks punishing breaks something, doesn't he?
sam_lowry_ 7 months ago It's more about the self-entitlement of security researchers.And that breaking things is easier than making things. Arnt 6 months ago The author really thinks punishing breaks something, doesn't he?
"The last stab in the back are HTTP/1.1 Desync attacks joyfully popularized by James Kettle in DEFCON and Black Hat conferences"
That sounds as if the author thinks http/1.1 is dying because attacks are published. Not because they exist and always have.
It's more about the self-entitlement of security researchers.
And that breaking things is easier than making things.
The author really thinks punishing breaks something, doesn't he?