← Back to context

Comment by butlike

3 days ago

I was on board until I realized there can be an infinite number of "nodes" (as defined in the post) between one another. The idea of destabilization/destruction of ideas works in the macro examples defined in the post, but may not be effective in practice, where the amount of major nodes between one idea and the next is opaque.

Any mapping of the destruction of one idea node in hindsight will suffer survivorship bias with the mapping seemingly sublimely simple. Hindsight is, as they say, always 20/20.