Yeah I'm glad I don't live in a two party state. The zero sum game politics that results in rips the country apart. You see this in the US and also in the UK (Brexit etc)
It's not better in countries with multiple parties where nearly everyone (every relevant party) wants authoritarianism in the name of "fighting hate speech".
It is all the same, under different names. Plus even in countries with multiple parties, it is usually only two parties that have a chance, but again, they usually (or always) have a similar (or the same) goals.
I assumed that meant "the other side of the conversation", e.g. "all parties involved".
Yeah I'm glad I don't live in a two party state. The zero sum game politics that results in rips the country apart. You see this in the US and also in the UK (Brexit etc)
It's not better in countries with multiple parties where nearly everyone (every relevant party) wants authoritarianism in the name of "fighting hate speech".
It is all the same, under different names. Plus even in countries with multiple parties, it is usually only two parties that have a chance, but again, they usually (or always) have a similar (or the same) goals.
2 replies →
I assumed they meant Republicans/Trump, but it's a bit confusing because those parties aren't very popular in the EU:
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/06/11/confidence-in-...
whatever your political alignment, saying the situation in the US is problematic might sell pretty well in the EU.
Don't be obtuse to make a point, the OP specifically stated they were in the United States.