Comment by WalterBright
9 days ago
It's a classic result of step functions, which are popular in tax codes and regulations.
For example, if you pollute 99 ppm, then you're good. If you pollute 100 ppm, you're bad.
9 days ago
It's a classic result of step functions, which are popular in tax codes and regulations.
For example, if you pollute 99 ppm, then you're good. If you pollute 100 ppm, you're bad.
I once half seriously proposed a limit on the second derivative of effective rates like this but imagine explaining that to a politician these days...