← Back to context Comment by jsrozner 7 days ago I love how science.org buries the actual content under four other things 3 comments jsrozner Reply gowld 6 days ago The top story, that peacocks shoot frickin laser beams! is much more interesting than the LLM navel gazing story. fc417fc802 6 days ago Thank you for mentioning that. I wouldn't have visited the link otherwise - I almost always go straight to arxiv. The official publication: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-04039-8 fireflash38 7 days ago I assume you're being facetious. I kind of enjoyed it? Maybe because it's science.org and not the click bait tabloid bs you'd normally see elsewhere.
gowld 6 days ago The top story, that peacocks shoot frickin laser beams! is much more interesting than the LLM navel gazing story. fc417fc802 6 days ago Thank you for mentioning that. I wouldn't have visited the link otherwise - I almost always go straight to arxiv. The official publication: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-04039-8
fc417fc802 6 days ago Thank you for mentioning that. I wouldn't have visited the link otherwise - I almost always go straight to arxiv. The official publication: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-04039-8
fireflash38 7 days ago I assume you're being facetious. I kind of enjoyed it? Maybe because it's science.org and not the click bait tabloid bs you'd normally see elsewhere.
The top story, that peacocks shoot frickin laser beams! is much more interesting than the LLM navel gazing story.
Thank you for mentioning that. I wouldn't have visited the link otherwise - I almost always go straight to arxiv. The official publication: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-04039-8
I assume you're being facetious. I kind of enjoyed it? Maybe because it's science.org and not the click bait tabloid bs you'd normally see elsewhere.