← Back to context Comment by robbomacrae 7 days ago Looks like this was the other opencode[0] and got (sensibly) rebranded:[0]: https://github.com/opencode-ai/opencode 1 comment robbomacrae Reply esafak 7 days ago Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthlyhttps://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthlyAn unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.
esafak 7 days ago Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthlyhttps://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthlyAn unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.
Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:
https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthly
https://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthly
An unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.