← Back to context Comment by robbomacrae 10 days ago Looks like this was the other opencode[0] and got (sensibly) rebranded:[0]: https://github.com/opencode-ai/opencode 1 comment robbomacrae Reply esafak 10 days ago Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthlyhttps://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthlyAn unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.
esafak 10 days ago Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthlyhttps://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthlyAn unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.
Exactly right. Was this one just open sourced? I don't remember seeing it when the SST opensource debacle broke. They're both under heavy development:
https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush/pulse/monthly
https://github.com/sst/opencode/pulse/monthly
An unfortunate clash. I can say from experience that the sst version has a lot of issues that would benefit from more manpower, even though they are working hard. If only they could resolve their differences.