Comment by jjbinx007
4 days ago
If true, does this give more credence to the so called "Blowtorch Theory" that was featured on HN a couple of months back?
4 days ago
If true, does this give more credence to the so called "Blowtorch Theory" that was featured on HN a couple of months back?
"The Blowtorch Theory: A new model for structure formation in the universe" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44115973
Shame he doesn't know enough to formulate a theory that this data could be compared to.
Maybe people will give him enough money to rent a scientist who can do the actual work for making it a coherent hypothesis that JWST data can be compared to.
No. That was a collection of vague ideas from an amateur. To do cosmology you have to be able to build mathematical models.
That's the amusing part. It's interesting it got as much interaction as it did
If these little red dots are actually black hole stars pumping out massive energy in the early universe, that kind of supports the idea
It was a blog post, not science.
That text does not deserve the title "theory".
Are you commenting on the style or the substance?
Both.