← Back to context

Comment by dingnuts

6 days ago

By Karpathy's definition it still isn't possible. But I've definitely been hearing about AI generated code being just as good as my code since 2022.

Don't gaslight us about timelines. The boosters have been telling us amateurs can code and we're all worthless for three and a half years now.

When ChatGPT was launched, they said we'd all be on the streets by now.

What I don't understand is the gleeful receipt of that news by some programmers

> What I don't understand is the gleeful receipt of that news by some programmers

I know there are very likely programmers that are gleeful about it, but I suspect that many of the gleeful voices we hear online are not programmers and are resentful of that fact

I see this a lot with the type of people who are making AI "artwork". They often lacked the discipline to practice and learn to make art themselves, they seem to bear an underlying resentment to people who do make art. They are the sort of people who think making art is tied to some innate talent and not something that you can practice. Now they are gleeful about AI generators because it lets them create the pictures in their head without the effort of learning a skill, and they are celebrating that they no longer suffer under the tyranny of people who actually enjoy drawing and painting

Pretty much. We are almost four years into “LLMs will make SWEs obsolete in 6 months” now. Turns out, most tools that let amateurs write bad code let pros write better code.