← Back to context Comment by chutes 10 days ago The horse raced past the barn fell 6 comments chutes Reply alt227 10 days ago I still have never managed to understand that one properly cpach 10 days ago I think it shall be interpreted like this: The creature who fell was the horse (that was previously raced past the barn). I.e. it was not the barn that fell. alt227 10 days ago Thankyou that makes sense!So in reality this is just an incorrect sentence. It should be written as"The horse that raced past the barn fell" 3 replies →
alt227 10 days ago I still have never managed to understand that one properly cpach 10 days ago I think it shall be interpreted like this: The creature who fell was the horse (that was previously raced past the barn). I.e. it was not the barn that fell. alt227 10 days ago Thankyou that makes sense!So in reality this is just an incorrect sentence. It should be written as"The horse that raced past the barn fell" 3 replies →
cpach 10 days ago I think it shall be interpreted like this: The creature who fell was the horse (that was previously raced past the barn). I.e. it was not the barn that fell. alt227 10 days ago Thankyou that makes sense!So in reality this is just an incorrect sentence. It should be written as"The horse that raced past the barn fell" 3 replies →
alt227 10 days ago Thankyou that makes sense!So in reality this is just an incorrect sentence. It should be written as"The horse that raced past the barn fell" 3 replies →
I still have never managed to understand that one properly
I think it shall be interpreted like this: The creature who fell was the horse (that was previously raced past the barn). I.e. it was not the barn that fell.
Thankyou that makes sense!
So in reality this is just an incorrect sentence. It should be written as
"The horse that raced past the barn fell"
3 replies →