← Back to context

Comment by regularization

1 day ago

> how much of a superpower simple shoe-leather reporting actually is. Derek Thompson's an incredibly sharp writer, but not really a subject matter expert on housing economics; all he did here was read papers and call up the authorities they cited, and the narrative behind those papers collapsed.

Matthew Stoller called the people Derek Thompson called, and some said Derek had misrepresented their opinions. So shoe leather caused the narrative of this so-called reputation to collapse as well.

> and some said Derek had misrepresented their opinions

Because he did? Or because once the entire cumulative picture got painted they looked bad and needed to walk their opinions back?

Link? I'd love to read countervailing reporting.