← Back to context

Comment by 0cf8612b2e1e

1 day ago

Why would I want comments produced by a roll of the dice rather the human who was in the thick of it?

I would instead be willing to consider some kind of QC assessment. Where does AI think the comment does not match the code because something has fallen out of sync.

I think people are misreading this. I said

> all comments that cant be reproduced by llm

Not remove all comments.

meaning if your comment is so low quality that an LLM will generate it for you by reading the code, then it doesn't belong in VCS

  • The problem is the non deterministic part

    An LLM can generate many valid reasons for doing X, including the right one, but you can't know which one of those it will give you