← Back to context Comment by bandyaboot 2 days ago And to add, the lawsuit didn’t lose on its merits, but on lack of jurisdiction. 2 comments bandyaboot Reply Incipient 2 days ago I feel like for lack of jurisdiction, the courts should refuse to hear the case, rather than have it count as a "lost" case? ncallaway 2 days ago I mean, that's basically what happens.The "lost her case" language is very much a public narrative around the court case, but from the legal perspective, her suit was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction, which is pretty much the court refusing to consider the case.
Incipient 2 days ago I feel like for lack of jurisdiction, the courts should refuse to hear the case, rather than have it count as a "lost" case? ncallaway 2 days ago I mean, that's basically what happens.The "lost her case" language is very much a public narrative around the court case, but from the legal perspective, her suit was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction, which is pretty much the court refusing to consider the case.
ncallaway 2 days ago I mean, that's basically what happens.The "lost her case" language is very much a public narrative around the court case, but from the legal perspective, her suit was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction, which is pretty much the court refusing to consider the case.
I feel like for lack of jurisdiction, the courts should refuse to hear the case, rather than have it count as a "lost" case?
I mean, that's basically what happens.
The "lost her case" language is very much a public narrative around the court case, but from the legal perspective, her suit was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction, which is pretty much the court refusing to consider the case.