Comment by yunruse
20 hours ago
Having just taken an IQ test out of curiosity, they strike me as testing very little beyond the ability to pattern recognise and extrapolate.
Having pattern recognised and extrapolated to my perception of the wealth-happiness curve, it seems that when your wants are met by your current wage, wanting more money is paradoxical -- it requires either time or stress that take away from the many other richnesses of life.
A little ambition (and savings) is good -- you can't recline too far back into the comfort zone -- but wealth never struck me as a particularly important measure of a person.
IQ is a very poor measure of intelligence (which is just speed), above 83.
Those that are above 83 will perform better than anyone under that number regardless of training. The military has quite a lot of research on this.
That's about all its useful for.
Could you please expand on that ? I haven't found any sources, the only thing that pops up is a bullshit claim by Jordan peterson, that has been debunked as, at best, an oversimplification.
Not OP but Nassim Taleb was written a lot about basically this
There is nothing more for me to expand on. If you want to do the research some of the starting sources are below.
Peterson has spoken alot on IQ and made several claims about IQ, you'll need to be specific about which claim you mean. Discarding everything the man says is just throwing the baby out with the bathwater, a fallacy/flawed logic.
Here are the sources:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210426091730/https://www.theba... - Covers the required AFQT scores, Army being 31.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201801...
https://web.archive.org/web/20200425230037/https://www.rand....