Comment by praptak
2 days ago
No, that's not what I concluded. I used the word "perhaps" to indicate that accusers telling the truth is a possibility. And it's one that cannot be ruled out even if we believe 100% of what the author wrote in this article.
There is an assertion at stake here along the lines of "he took advantage of me" which is either objectively true or is not objectively true. It may be impossible for us to know what his actual motivation was at the time the undisputed events took place, but if everyone agreed his intentions were pure, then he wouldn't be ostracized. So there is no way for everyone's statements to be in perfect alignment with objective reality.