US Nuclear Weapons Return to UK After 2008 Withdrawal 1 day ago (thedefensepost.com) 4 comments bbarnett Reply Add to library lazzurs 1 day ago The only winning move is not to play. fractallyte 16 hours ago No.If the enemy insists on "playing", there should be a tit-for-tat response. This is a fundamental result from game theory, and an empirical conclusion if one peruses Russia's history with its neighbors. voxadam 11 hours ago They were quoting WarGames (1983).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw more_corn 12 hours ago I love how we did the enemy’s intelligence work for them. I suppose it’s only a deterrent if they know about it but the opsec here doesn’t bode well.
lazzurs 1 day ago The only winning move is not to play. fractallyte 16 hours ago No.If the enemy insists on "playing", there should be a tit-for-tat response. This is a fundamental result from game theory, and an empirical conclusion if one peruses Russia's history with its neighbors. voxadam 11 hours ago They were quoting WarGames (1983).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw
fractallyte 16 hours ago No.If the enemy insists on "playing", there should be a tit-for-tat response. This is a fundamental result from game theory, and an empirical conclusion if one peruses Russia's history with its neighbors. voxadam 11 hours ago They were quoting WarGames (1983).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw
more_corn 12 hours ago I love how we did the enemy’s intelligence work for them. I suppose it’s only a deterrent if they know about it but the opsec here doesn’t bode well.
The only winning move is not to play.
No.
If the enemy insists on "playing", there should be a tit-for-tat response. This is a fundamental result from game theory, and an empirical conclusion if one peruses Russia's history with its neighbors.
They were quoting WarGames (1983).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw
I love how we did the enemy’s intelligence work for them. I suppose it’s only a deterrent if they know about it but the opsec here doesn’t bode well.